The cgc was an impressive display on all sides. Two teams seem to have very good solvers...mayhem and shellfish.
-
-
Replying to @daveaitel
.
@daveaitel overall score was determined more by availability and patching than bug finding. Need to review raw data later.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dguido
yeah but shellfish and mayhem managed some useful bugs. Crackaddr and the Morris worm bug for example
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @daveaitel
that's true but out of 96 challenges they only talked about 6. Many more hard challenges in that dataset.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dguido @daveaitel
Sidenote: we'll start adding those new challenges to our benchmarking dataset when they're released:https://github.com/trailofbits/cb-multios …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dguido @daveaitel
@github Your fuzzing system will be released some point of time?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
our fuzzer is largely based on Radamsa which is already open source: https://github.com/aoh/radamsa
-
-
I was asking about GRR.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.