The researcher responses to this bug bounty are awful. They're not there to pay your salary, it's a thank you.http://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2016/07/13/fiat-chrysler-small-bug-bounty-for-hackers/#58cc01f4606f …
-
-
Replying to @dguido
@iblametom but that is just what bug bounties are in your opinion. People who actually do bug bounties do it to make a living.5 replies 3 retweets 13 likes -
that's their problem, rewarder has no obligation just because some "security researchers" don't have a real job
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
you judge as harsh with every other person working as freelancer in infosec?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
being an infosec freelancer is radically different than expecting payouts for spontaneously reported bugs
2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
no it is not. Bug bounty programs inviting audits are like freelance work without formal contracts.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
In proper freelance work lack of results is paid, also what Dan said is spot on. Let us agree to strongly disagree
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
yes "proper" freelancers get paid for sitting around. Bug bounty submitters that you look down on are not
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
time invested investigating attacks that lead no results is far from "sitting around", you're the one looking down
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
consultants get paid even when sitting in meetings and falling asleep
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I never said there weren't benefits.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.