entire thread rests on the assumption that working for gov and supporting human rights are mutually exclusive.
-
-
it's offensive to ask for an "apology" from people doing gov work before they can contribute to some toy privacy tool
-
all of this reminds me of the insults Soghoian used to toss around, labeling people as "ex-NSAer" as if it's a slur
-
it's the height of immaturity...
-
I agree. I'm usually the one defending the NSA. I"m not sure what your point is.
-
that an ex govvie has nothing to apologize for if seeking a job at a human rights NGO, and asking for one is stupid.
-
it's valid for an NGO to have concerns, though. Which, I think, was the impetus behind suggesting formalized protections
-
I think some aspects of the suggestions were naive and I largely agree with you yet there is a valid need for safety nets
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
sadly it appears so. my thoughts exactly
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
hope when one says "human rights" it means "humans" and not "humans politically inoffensive to USG."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In your estimate, what percentage of the IC community believes what Snowden did was good?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.