If you were wondering what this cryptic tweet was about, wait no longer!https://twitter.com/dguido/status/725752173892648961 …
-
-
Forbes story was written by CEO of Cybersecurity Ventures. Forbes needs better oversight of its contributor network.
-
thanks, saw it was the same article and author but didn't dive into it past that. Definitely agree on the Forbes point.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
yep, on device messages are NOT encrypted on iOS as well. Anyone with access to phone/cloud/backup can read messages.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
John McAfee it's Satoshi Nakamoto
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paultag So, he could read them. In the same way that .gov will read them. Pointing that out worthwhile. -
I say .gov - .cn/.ru etc. of course just as likely, depending on who you're annoying.
-
Yes, but that's not the point :) It's easy to own a single person. Safe cryptosystems help prevent dragnets.
-
It's disingenuous to say this is a whatsapp vuln, it's not, it's an infrastructure issue, which I bet you agree with.
-
Well yes, but that's only a useful distinction to make if you're only comparing WA to other apps in same ecosystem...
-
I think most secure protocols have this issue; TLS secures a password, but it's captured if you have a keylogger
-
It's a borderline non-sequitur
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@hackerfantastic surely the point here is 'he was able to read the message' - HOW doesn't really matter @ Dan -
No
@cliffsull - quite the opposite in fact: the HOW is VERY important.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.