-
-
Replying to @JSyversen
@JSyversen@VZDBIR@mroytman Jason, what are you trying to say? Do you believe this data? Do you think it's benign to publish in@VZDBIR?4 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JSyversen
@JSyversen@VZDBIR@mroytman as I make clear in our post, the DBIR is a critical tool for manys work. It needs to be accurate.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @JSyversen
@JSyversen@VZDBIR@mroytman the analysis they are selling is patently false, and people depend on it. This isn't some kind of game.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dguido
@dguido@JSyversen@VZDBIR that is false, the analysis is solid, if noisy, and nothing is being sold kind sir. It's free and open1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mroytman
@mroytman@JSyversen@VZDBIR if the conclusion is false, the analysis is wrong. What kind of scientist are you?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dguido
@mroytman@JSyversen@VZDBIR you're the one publishing all this bad data, it's your job to get it right, not mine.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dguido
@mroytman@JSyversen@VZDBIR I reacted to this because I saw potential for real harm done by your slapshod work in the DBIR2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@mroytman @JSyversen @VZDBIR it is dishonest to rush to publication with unreliable results then ask others to clean it up for you
-
-
Replying to @dguido
.
@dguido@JSyversen@VZDBIR our analysis is of two datasets, one of which you have expertise in. Offer stands, read the whole, help improve.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.