@dguido @jvanegue @chrisrohlf @sergeybratus Nobody holds the "for" position, so the "against" is fighting a straw man. No?
We welcome the first 3 members of our automated exploitation panel at THREADS: @chrisrohlf @sergeybratus @jvanegue http://threads.isis.poly.edu
-
-
-
@seanhn@dguido@chrisrohlf@sergeybratus we need David Brumley in there. - 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@grsecurity IIRC the article won best paper award, which should answer your question. Besides limited practical impact, it was well written. -
@jvanegue@grsecurity@chrisrohlf@sergeybratus@jvanegue there are valid arguments for AE. How we weigh them is subjective at best. - 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@dguido Nice. I am thinking of coming down for THREADS if I can squeeze it in. Program looks great.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@grsecurity@seanhn if by public debate you include research papers, then no, the last time is IEEE S&P 2012Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.