-
-
Replying to @dinodaizovi
@dinodaizovi@thegrugq@dguido my mistake :) *two* weekends, one hacker, minimal motivation != "extremely high"3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dakami
@dakami@dinodaizovi Also what@thegrugq is true: ASLR/DEP impose continuing cost. ExploitShield is “bypassed” once and done.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dguido
@dguido@dinodaizovi@thegrugq These are all very compelling theories. What does the empirical data say though?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dakami
@dakami@dguido@dinodaizovi what are you measuring?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thegrugq
@thegrugq@dguido@dinodaizovi An apparent 100% success rate stopping unsignatured malware feels like it deserves some respect4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dakami
@dakami@thegrugq@dinodaizovi Rather, AV has a 100% success rate detecting malware that hasn’t tried to bypass it.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dguido
@dguido@thegrugq@dinodaizovi AV is signature based and has an enormous false positive rate if they try anything funny1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dakami
@dakami@thegrugq@dinodaizovi AV is in the same position as ExploitShield. If it’s worth it to bypass, you will with minimal effort.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@JaredSperli @itsosafe TBH, I think we're done reviewing software like this for a while. I feel like I've met you guys before...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.