Did Apple really scored two wins by asking information?https://twitter.com/dguido/status/1242903330784976896 …
-
-
Replying to @msuiche
I'm not an interested party. Yes, I think Apple's request that Corellium provide a substantial amount of unredacted source code via a git repo is a fairly sizable win.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dguido
The Corellium request is totally crazy yes. But regarding the L3Harris request, what is the win?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @msuiche
That Apple got anything at all. L3 Harris has to produce emails and client countries with a possibility for further followup and depositions based on them. L3 Harris argued they weren't a party to the case at all.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @dguido
Basically, Apple is asking if there are US clients and if yes, they won't follow up?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
No, L3 said "we don't have to answer you", the court said "yes, you do", and now Apple gets a record of email communication between Corellium and a partial list of their government customers. Apple will then dig into that information further in future filings.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.