sure sounds like someone representing themselves as a person who knows how checkra1n works does not actually know what they’re talking about.pic.twitter.com/8ONEmDFB4A
Show this thread
-
Don't get me wrong: it would be work, but repackaging would be easier than developing everything from scratch. There are few people who can write an exploit for checkm8, but many who could engineer the kind of rootkit we're talking about. That's why checkra1n changes things.
Last thing: I don't have a problem with checkra1n. It is what it is! I know it's not made for evil. However, any abuse of components inside it will happen without permission, help, or maybe even knowledge of the original authors.
-
-
my mild annoyance honestly stems from the lack of attention to detail here. checkm8 had an exploit implementation upon release. you could load an iBSS/iBEC with integrity checks patched the traditional way and then load up a custom RAM disk to do as you wish
-
for those who aren’t familiar with iBoot & friends or how they process image4 files, there has been code available publicly in a fork which could assist:https://github.com/LinusHenze/ipwndfu_public/commit/82691f56eef9d49411f38c0c883617133ae48b54 …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.