Smart contracts auditing companies like @trailofbits @ConsenSys Diligence or @OpenZeppelin should provide insurance services for smart contracts they are confident in.
Companies and users could pay x% per year to cover potential fund losses held or managed by some contracts.
-
I said nothing about profit in my two replies.https://twitter.com/dguido/status/1182841047363264512 …
Firms should hire @trailofbits because I'll pledge to never gamble against my own clients or abuse insider information for personal profit. Users should know that our reports are never tainted by a personal profit motive. Avoid hiring anyone who won't do the same.
-
-
It's so extraordinarily unethical to be granted direct, unfettered access to a firm's engineering team, then turn around and gamble with that knowledge in a 3rd party betting pool. Think of the second order effects knowing that your security firm will start placing bets on you.
-
I may be mistaking, but my assumption was that both security firms and insurance firms have a strong incentive for contracts to be secure. If a contract is insecure, the formers lose their reputation while the laters lose funds (to reimburse losses). Where is the misalignment?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.