Well, that's...interesting. I have to be honest - I don't understand the basis of the talk enough to speak on whether or not it deserved the criticism it got, but suing the conference because you got booed by audience members is...a look.https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/08/company-accused-of-crypto-snake-oil-sues-black-hat-anonymous-detractors/ …
-
I'm not sure there is a good article like that, because this falls into the category of "not even wrong". In general, the burden of proof for extraordinary claims falls on the claimant, and this would be very easy to prove if they could - just factor a RSA-2048 public key!
Here are a few: * https://www.pcmag.com/news/370119/black-hat-attendees-sponsored-session-was-snake-oil-crypto … * https://twitter.com/LargeCardinal/status/1159435062921846790 … * https://withoutbullshit.com/blog/is-this-crown-sterling-press-release-from-another-planet … tl;dr take the sieve of eratosthenes (or similar), put it on a wheel, add colors, then claim all cryptography is broken.
-
-
Thank you so much and also your summary made me spit green tea out my nose, so it's victory all around.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would have written more had I known it would be widely shared! I still think this test is the only way to validate their claims.https://twitter.com/LargeCardinal/status/1160088787680149505 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I stand corrected!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.