Systems that rely on trusted authorities can be compromised with low cost (case in point: SSL/TLS). Panvala solves this problem by decentralizing trust through a token-curated registry.https://twitter.com/PanvalaMark/status/1016337610787180545 …
Consumer Reports tells you "We like it" or "It works", not "It withstands sustained, active attack." UL is closer, though they also do not incorporate adversary-induced failure cases in their certifications afaik.
-
-
Thinking about it more, I think the closest analogy is PCI Compliance.
-
The wording and exact specification for the mark(s) will need some fine-tuning. Perhaps "compliant" or "approved" might be more fitting than "safe"?
-
I'll watch how this evolves over time! I think you've got to be cognizant of the position this puts reviewers in, and the type and granularity of the data they report rather than simply "safe."
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.