There is a large literature directly refuting your claim ...https://www.dovepress.com/female-genital-mutilation-and-male-circumcision-toward-an-autonomy-bas-peer-reviewed-article-MB …
-
New conversation
-
-
-
The fact you say that FGM and MGM "have nothing in common" is proof enough that you have not thought about this issue at all except through the prism of some almost insane prejudice. Of course they have something in common - and both should be banned.
-
The fact that she calls one "genital mutilation" while euphemizing the other as "circumcision" is even more telling.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If you try to get your dog or cat circumcised you would be arrested for animal cruelty. But having your baby boy circumcised is considered normal behavior.
-
Society hates men. We are literally less than dogs. Its sad
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
For anyone who wants to personally and permanently refute for themselves the notion that male circumcision is “not comparable” to even the worst forms of
#FGM as practiced in similar cultural contexts, I invite you to view these photos. Warning: graphic. http://buff.ly/2D26yJU - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
That is the most misinformed piece I have read on the subject.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"...when danger to an individual is not a concern." Why don't you tell that to the parents of the many boys killed by their circumcisions? https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/newborn-bleeds-to-death-after-doctor-persuades-parents-to-have-him-circumcised-in-canada-a6710061.html …pic.twitter.com/TeydJkBk6A
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Male circumcision(in all it's forms) and female circumcision(in all it's forms) are morally equivalent and should be discussed in a singular ethical discourse. Don't trivialise males forms and create a moral confusion .
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Religious freedom is religious freedom. Either
#muhreligion justifies the forced genital cutting of minors or it does not. Arguing "religious freedom" for one group, but denying it in another is self-serving special pleading.#i2Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or maybe all the African boys and young men who've had their penises crippled or destroyed in dangerous rituals across Africa?https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/25/male-circumcision-ceremonies-death-deformity-africa …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Of cause not. The one thing is genital mutilation and the other is, well, genital mutilation, not comparable at all.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And so is she. There's nothing incompatible about the right of a week old baby to keep his foreskin & the right of a three month old child to life.
-
If she means a three month old born child, then she's talking about infanticide, not abortion.
-
Pro-choicers can't defend forced non-therapeutic surgery on a child b/c it violates a born person's bodily autonomy. Pro-lifers can't defend it b/c it violates a child's bodily integrity. Having no principled way to defend child cutting is one of their few shared attributes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.