They suggest that what works is: 1. Test/trace/isolate 2. Mask-wearing 3. Distancing 4. Travel restrictions 5. Identifying & stopping super-spreading events. 5. Good guidance to public on what is risky & not.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Receiving notes from those w/ risk factors (asthma, overweight, hypertension, cancer survivors, diabetes) or elderly who are saddened by their lives being portrayed as worthless (ie acceptable loss, would die anyways). Please remember this is not the view of the silent majority.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Or disproven.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Not only not possible to identify vulnerable, not right to fully isolate them for anything other than a short time
-
Exactly, pretty sure you'd be breaching human rights law.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Scotland's "Zero-Covid" Strategy Isn't Working. Sturgeon thinks she can use that as a killer argument for independence in the next referendum. Scots have had to endure a more severe lockdown than the UK over the summer. Needless to say, it hasn't worked.pic.twitter.com/gwKcUaL6AC
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Doesn’t mean it is correct. Science has ballsed this up as often as it has assisted. Very mixed record.
-
It’s a new disease. They’re figuring it out. Mortality is already lower because they’ve already figured some stuff out.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
