Are they simply conceding 3% of the population?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think British people are not good at simple math. Only 0.1% of the population getting infected at the same time, the ICUs of hospitals will be overflowed like Italy and Wuhan. How do you get more than 60% of the population infected to gain social immunity?
-
Getting them infected is easy. Treating them afterwards may be tricky.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
As Pence said in an interview not long ago, "We like to do things our way in America" I'm starting to dislike this so-called "American way."
End of conversation
-
-
-
Likewise- every healthcare worker I’ve spoken to at work disagrees with the current policy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
40 million people catching a virus that we he have no idea what long term effects on the human body are.
-
And it also seems that people can catch it more than once, so *no* immunity.

- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Exactly my conclusion: they took the influenza scenario’s, instead of knowledge regarding this brand new virus and its behavior: 10x higher mortality compared to flu and a 100% susceptible population is a totally different game.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
