Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @dev01ution

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @dev01ution

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    How much space will Brexit free up in the European Union? 1 GB

    Poništi
  2. 28. sij

    TL;DR: TS isn’t superset of JS. That’s just marketing ploy to make yet another EEE

    Poništi
  3. 27. sij

    polititians sending you thoughts and prayers is like you being sent penis enlargement spam

    Poništi
  4. 22. sij
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    19. sij

    (poll) Do you plan to *purchase* (ebook or print) any of the 2nd edition books? (plz RT for reach)

    Poništi
  6. 19. sij

    The Rulers of Europe: Every Year

    Poništi
  7. 18. sij

    There is a room for educating people that “compiled” languages of old (those that don’t get executed by VM) are missing out on JIT optimizations thus making them, when used in general, have inferior performance than the “interpreted” ones

    Poništi
  8. 17. sij

    You aren’t removing complexity but moving Truth 6: It is easier to move a problem around (for example, by moving the problem to a different part of the overall network architecture) than it is to solve it. 6a (corollary). It is always possible to add another level of indirection

    Tweet je nedostupan.
    Poništi
  9. 16. sij

    So, it turns out typeof null isn't a bug, but null is an object by design 🤪

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. sij

    Ecma now hosts an archive of documents relating to the development of ECMAScript from 1996-2015. It was created in support of the JavaScript HOPL paper and contains many documents that were previously only available to Ecma members. Thanks

    Poništi
  11. 8. sij

    (joins the Obscure Specifications Anonymous support group) - Hi, my name is CommonMark. - HI, MARK ! I mean, going from Example 1 to Example 649 to explain what you specify in other words... Weren't specifications meant to end ambiguities?

    Poništi
  12. 31. pro 2019.

    My lesson from the decade: people still don't know when decades end, and those who do are worse when they insist on grammar, not math as the solution for them not turning out dumb and ignorant

    Poništi
  13. 30. pro 2019.

    Even worse, people who know this dinstinction, but still chose to propagate the lexical (have same part of the name) over the semantical (natural numbers mathematics) meaning of the word “decade” out of spite because they didn’t like being corrected when they propagated confusion

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 30. pro 2019.

    Many people misinterpret these as the decade... When some one mentiones decade, without qualifying it, it signifies a calendar decade, from a calendar that uses natural numbers, thus: 1-10, 21-30, 1991-2000, 2001-2010, 2011-2020... And, there are people, who mix them up...

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 30. pro 2019.

    Later on, we learnt different music and art in general, even historical events that were created or happened in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s... Each of those number 10 years sharing a part of the name, like fifty, sixty, seventy... just like the teens do, yet...

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 30. pro 2019.

    Then, years later, we learnt English. And after few years of practicing English, I understood teen age is the age the name of the number ends in -teen, so: 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 Teen numbers aren’t a decade (they count 7 not 10), and no one misinterprets decade as teens

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 30. pro 2019.

    First numbers we used at first grade at peimary school were the natural numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10... Next we learnt all have successors, and all but 1 have predecessors. Then we learned the first decade is 1-10, second is 11-20 and so on.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 28. pro 2019.

    person is software, relationship between persons is network, society is an intranet etc. all backed by the execution of the biological hardware we call human organism

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 28. pro 2019.

    software is the effect of the working (computer ) hardware - together we call them computer analogy ideas are the software of the biological hardware - together we call that human

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 28. pro 2019.

    since in JS isn't the same private as private in other languages, maybe it should't be called private but "sharp field" opposing "dull field" (because we've already know them for decades?)

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·