Derek WillisVerified account

Perhaps I'm dense but I fail to see your point. In other words, welcome to American politics.

a bit more than typical, even for American politics.

Have you looked into HRC's nefarious funding methods ala Clinton 'Foundation'? If so, I stand corrected. Be well!

the Clinton Foundation has been the source of some pretty good reporting. always need to look at that sort of thing.

You'll forgive me if I trust any scrutiny of the Clinton Foundation as far as I can throw a bus. Concede ur point & wish u well

the same to you, sir.

This is money he's lending to his campaign, which he may or may not reclaim. So of course it's unusual vs Clinton practices

the money he loans to the campaign is a separate matter. these are payments by the campaign.

@desmoinesdem what percentage is this, of total expenditures for the reporting period?

not very much, actually. doesn't include $5 million for his plane or $423k for Mar-a-Lago, though.

if you included those?

somewhere around 10%.

he spent$70MM?

his campaign has spent about $64 million so far: https://projects.propublica.org/itemizer/committee/C00580100/2016 …

I was talking about whatever reporting period you initially used. I had assumed it was just May.

no, that's total through May 31.

your point? Hillary funded by Saudi blood money.

Clinton foundation is; not her campaign.

really. So that makes it ok? Move along your part of the problem. I dont support either candidate. So u know.

how is reporting what candidates spend money on part of the problem?

are u a Hillary supporter? You also condone blood money to presidential candidates charities. U dont think that's wrong?

I'm a reporter. I try to report what I find and let people decide what they condone or not.

where can I read your articles. Send me the link and ill chk for bias. Fair?