Derek T. MullerVerified account

@derektmuller

Professor of Law, ; election law, federal courts, & legal ed. 313 native. I don't read the replies. Rhymes with duller.

Iowa City, IA
Joined May 2012

Tweets

You blocked @derektmuller

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @derektmuller

  1. Retweeted
    9 hours ago
    Undo
  2. Dec 4
    Undo
  3. Dec 4

    Good time to re-up my short piece Online, "Restraining Judicial Application of the 'Safe Harbor' Provision in the Electoral Count Act":

    Undo
  4. Retweeted
    Nov 17

    Honored to serve. We did it right. Defend Today, Secure Tomrorow.

    Undo
  5. Nov 12
    Undo
  6. Nov 9

    Aggressive litigation in Arizona, Wisconsin, & Pennsylvania kept the Green Party off the ballot this year. One such detail below:

    Undo
  7. Nov 9

    No "folly," no "Potemkin Villages," no "wildfires"--a semester of in-person hybrid legal education

    Undo
  8. Nov 9
    Undo
  9. Nov 7

    It's all a replay of 4 years ago--late fundraising for recounts vaguely alleging fraud, pushing wild Electoral College scenarios--except that instead of being led by fringe groups like the Green Party & Harvard Law faculty, it's out of the White House.

    Undo
  10. Nov 7

    Nearly four years ago, & kicked around a "Lame Duck Pardon Amendment." It didn't go anywhere. Here it is:

    Undo
  11. Nov 5

    ...worth adding that while state legislatures have the final say over the choosing of electors, Congress has the final say over whether to count them....

    Undo
  12. Nov 4

    Publicly-funded presidential campaigns--run as recently as 2008--would have entitled candidates to $103.7 million to run a national campaign this year. Some Senate races are starting to outpace even that total.

    Undo
  13. Nov 4

    A recount in a close statewide election rarely changes the result. History shows the margin has to be something like 0.01%--not 1%, one-hundredth of one percent--separating the two candidates for a *possible* change in outcome.

    Undo
  14. Nov 3

    Four (unlikely) ways the 2020 presidential election ends up in the House of Representatives

    Show this thread
    Undo
  15. Nov 1

    The 2014 Cromnibus allows you to contribute $5600 to a presidential primary & general campaign, but $106,500 "to defray expenses incurred with respect to the preparation for & the conduct of election recounts & contests & other legal proceedings." It incentivizes litigation.

    Undo
  16. Nov 1

    I don't know how to quantify my improvement, if any, as a scholar over the years, but I've tried (still not great) to be much better about (1) respectfully (2) engaging opposing views, in part by (3) fairly summarizing those views & (4) avoiding adjectives & adverbs

    Undo
  17. Oct 28

    Election litigation 2020.

    Undo
  18. Oct 28

    I wondered back in May what would happen in jurisdictions that didn't scale & equate their bar exams. The result, it appears, have been significant increases in pass rates as a result of state-specific new scoring:

    Undo
  19. Oct 26

    What the lawyers fought for so vigorously in Bush v. Gore was actually the exact opposite of what would later prove most advantageous to their clients--a peril of election litigation positions over the unknown.

    Undo
  20. Oct 23
    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·