First, the link to the video. I suggest you check it out yourself at some point; I’ll just highlight the worst bits here. Don’t forget to leave it the thumb rating it deserves.https://youtu.be/cfmpnGV0IGc
-
-
Show this thread
-
Rufo, like Lindsay, is now incorporating the idea that the (Jewish) Frankfurt School engineered CRT to promote division between White and Black Americans so that they could overthrow White rule and install a Communist government. This is literal neo-Nazism, plain as day.pic.twitter.com/vq9BFR1VJH
Show this thread -
Marcuse and his student Angela Davis are cast as the masterminds behind this project in the post-1968 U.S. Rufo doesn't define CRT. He just tells you what words it uses to mask its Neo-Marxism: "Equity," "Social Justice," etc. "This is deliberate."pic.twitter.com/LsoqfA7QQ9
Show this thread -
Here Rufo flexes the CV of bullshit and disinformation he's been building over the past year. Rufo layers his bullshit: many claims here are even more misleading than their counterparts in the City Journal pieces. The goalpost shifts are imperceptible if you don't look for them.pic.twitter.com/q6qpTZnYdA
Show this thread -
If you want the debunkings, they're all here:https://conceptualdisinformation.substack.com/p/chris-rufo-professional-bullshit …
Show this thread -
Now we get something closer to a definition. Rufo says the "premise" of CRT is that, given the racist history of the US, we should examine the role racism may continue to play on a societal level. TRUE. Its "conclusion" -- intersectional Marxist woke revolution. FALSE.pic.twitter.com/l2rvaqWCY0
Show this thread -
Finally: the war on CRT Rufo wants to fight on four fronts. 1) Public policy - in many cases a front for banning all discussion of sexism and racism from the classroom, given the def. of "race/sex stereotyping" from the EO. 2) Unconstitutional - renders (1) totally futile.pic.twitter.com/5gfVA74hoo
Show this thread -
**That is, if (1) is just supposed to ban things that are already illegal, and over which you're already suing, what actual purpose can it accomplish? Well, you can try to use it to ban concepts, like legislators have done in TX, OK, and TN.**
Show this thread -
"The stakes of this fight are incredibly high," Rufo says, as he claims CRT constitutes a genuine existential threat to the United States in every manner, seeking to abolish property rights, free speech, equal protection under the law, free enterprise, and federalism itself.pic.twitter.com/77cZv3C9tU
Show this thread -
"Truth and justice are on our side," he says. "If we can muster the courage, we will win." There's nothing left to add but this reminder: [FIN]https://twitter.com/deonteleologist/status/1371593249962401797?s=20 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
