Denis Andrejew

@denisandrejew

Building systems & infrastructure --

Austria
Vrijeme pridruživanja: listopad 2009.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @denisandrejew

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @denisandrejew

  1. 24. sij

    Same team that built puppeteer is kicking things up a notch, great to see.

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. pro 2019.

    Customers have more money than VCs do.

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    81 pounds of Lego, books, and Oreos. Bill Gates has good taste :)

    Poništi
  4. 26. pro 2019.

    Very true. Pressure in software projects is always rooted in management and leadership problems. Never settle for a workplace and/or team situation where you as a developer have to pay for shortcomings of the former.

    Poništi
  5. 15. pro 2019.

    Reminding myself, remembering, that music is meant to be made and shared, an act of being creative together, harmonizing with each other.

    Poništi
  6. 14. pro 2019.

    TIL "umami" is the 5th basic taste, and also explains the prevalence of addition of MSG and friends to foods

    Poništi
  7. 11. pro 2019.

    95% of the code I see companies building every day is redundant, by re-specifying either common patterns (with bugs!), common domain knowledge (again with bugs) or project-specific knowledge that's already been specified elsewhere. Why are we not doing better?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 11. pro 2019.

    ... and developer language via NLP and other ML methods, already contains so much easily machine-accessible information about what I'm intending to build that it feels extremely stupid and primitive that I need to spell it all out again and again for the machine.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 11. pro 2019.

    And this is just the tip of the iceberg. I already have at least a database schema at this point, likely also an API (which already contains redundant how-to-wire-this-shit-up information!), which, especially if enhanced with a little bit of high-level understanding of human...

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 11. pro 2019.

    any further than this yet? Yes, "declarative" is on developers' and toolmakers' minds, to a degree, but I don't see anyone actually solving this problem properly. Why? I want to see something like , but as a full-featured developer-focused tool / meta-tool / paradigm...

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 11. pro 2019.

    a full programming language to describe, yet here I am using full-blown JS/TS for this silly standard kind of interaction which probably contains a few bits of actual unique information, and the rest is just noise. I can't be the only one wondering why we haven't progressed /4

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 11. pro 2019.

    then make sure I use some kind of reactive context for constructing the resulting URL, make sure I show some kind of loading / activity indicator to the user, go load the data and render the content, then hide the indicator... All quite standard patterns that do not need /3

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 11. pro 2019.

    what parts of my UI should update and how when a user selects a value in a dropdown. "Input goes into this part of the URL used to fetch data to be displayed in this portion of the UI..." Why do I have to manually link up the dropdown to an event handler then extract the value /2

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 11. pro 2019.

    It's been a while since I've last had to write web frontend code. I don't understand why I still cannot declaratively specify how the UI is supposed to work instead of imperatively implementing it. I don't need a turing-complete language to describe ... /1

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. pro 2019.

    The annual survey is now live! If you use Rust or if you don't, please fill it out!

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. pro 2019.

    So, I have been busy starting some big things with and . More details coming tomorrow, but for now, a (literal) teaser:

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. stu 2019.

    Tokio 0.2 is released. Also, a roadmap to 1.0:

    Poništi
  18. 25. stu 2019.

    Is this why companies put up bullshit walls of bullshit questions in their interviews, to defend against such bullshit from scammers and others severely misrepresenting themselves? (I'm not a fan of that common interview process; but this would make at least a tiny bit of sense.)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 25. stu 2019.

    I mean... shit!? What are people doing about that? Are there blacklists for this? Is this one of the reasons that some folks are working on modern HR software with ML aspects, to identify and filter out these scams etc?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 25. stu 2019.

    I guess that even though I know that there is scam going on elsewhere, I never considered it could be happening right in my backyard, so to speak. I am sometimes competing with scammers, some past and future clients have been / will be scammed.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·