dunno, most of what I've heard was "we broke this for fun, it's not useful, and we're not going to explain how"
the difference is that the technical detalis were explained in one case, left unexplained in the other
-
-
well again i don't think that's really true. not *everything* was covered, but certainly enough to make it interesting imo
-
i do think it could have been more interesting to detail the glitch procedure further, but i don't think it makes it a bad talk
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.