@winocm well, I figured it out after reading more docs: it provides adequate protection against bootkit-type attacks, not physical attacks
I guess the UEFI code can always be altered to bypass the signature checks anyway... what's the point of Secure Boot then?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@winocm in my case I'm more looking for physical attack / trusted boot kind of things - now reading about Intel TXT, which is TPM backed.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@winocm sure, some people do stupid things with Secure Boot - I prefer how trusted boot is done in Chromebooks for example - physical switchThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@winocm any way to downgrad 7.1 to 7.0.6 plzzzz tel meThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.