Maybe there’s reason to take these #s seriously. But this kind of online poll is also sketchy b/c it’s hard to validate (note use of a “credibility interval,” which means “maybe credible, but not based on standard probability sampling”). https://www.aapor.org/Publications-Media/Press-Releases/Archived-Press-Releases/Understanding-a-credibility-interval …”-and-how-it-d.aspxhttps://twitter.com/shadihamid/status/991526922646638592 …
-
-
Replying to @kdendulk
Those numbers Don’t jive with my sense of things, but what do I know
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @KedronBardwell @TheAlanNoble and
Here's a snapshot of 25k @HarvardIOP cases since 2013 of party id by white 18-29 and non-white.pic.twitter.com/23HXLgiQn5
7:02 PM - 2 May 2018
from Massachusetts, USA
0 replies
0 retweets
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.