Peripheral vision spontaneously prompts action. If I need to fix a door, I’ll be reminded each time I see it. Digital task lists live in a dedicated app. I have no natural cause to look at that app regularly, so I need to establish a new habit to explicitly review my task list.
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
Peripheral vision emphasizes the concrete. Unread digital books and papers live in some folder or app, invisible until I decide that “it’s reading time.” But that confuses cause and effect.pic.twitter.com/3iHuLIEZYq
1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 117 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
If I leave books lying on my coffee table, I’ll naturally notice them at receptive moments. I'll read a book if I feel an actual, concrete interest in it. By contrast, the motivation to read a digital book comes from abstract interest in the habit of reading.
12 proslijeđenih tweetova 178 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Peripheral vision offers context. If I mark up a physical book then later flip through to see my margin notes, I’ll always see them in the context of the surrounding text. By contrast, digital annotation listings usually display only the text I highlighted, removed from context.pic.twitter.com/OLlkjLpipe
4 proslijeđena tweeta 90 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
The primary “unit” in such systems is a single highlight or note, but that’s not how I think. Marginalia have fuzzy boundaries, and I often think of a page’s markings as a single unit. LiquidText is a lovely counterexample: it works hard to display annotations in context.pic.twitter.com/A5rz26mppH
5 replies 11 proslijeđenih tweetova 215 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
In digital note systems, the UI centers on the experience of writing one note. The core operations and representations fixate on “the note you have open,” not on larger structures. I often can’t simultaneously see another note I’ve just finished writing—let alone the last four.
5 proslijeđenih tweetova 80 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Most systems barely support multiple windows, but even if I can open multiple windows, it’s awkward to arrange them into the spatial relationships I might naturally use for physical index cards. Rather than peripheral vision, it’s like I’m wearing horse blinders and mittens.pic.twitter.com/1akRdeFfv2
5 replies 4 proslijeđena tweeta 88 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Backlinks are a weak peripheral vision, and they help, but they’re generally about switching the one note you have open, not an effective means of sense-making across many notes. Contextual backlinks help, but if you navigate, you lose object permanence.
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 61 korisnik označava da mu se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
If I read an old digital note, I get the unnerving sense that it’s part of some “whole” that I can’t see at all—no matter how much hypertext is involved. Working with physical notes, I’d shuffle notes around to make sense of the structure. There isn’t a digital equivalent.
8 replies 3 proslijeđena tweeta 103 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Relatedly, there are lots of fun attempts at simultaneously showing the forest and the trees in dense graph visualization. The general approaches alone don’t seem to be enough, but maybe combined with some domain-specific semantics... This is a nice one: http://www.yunhaiwang.net/infovis18/fisheye/index.html …pic.twitter.com/bDqPDfYTW5
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit
Not 100% related, but I think you’ll find this interesting:http://m.nautil.us/blog/new-evidence-for-the-geometry-of-thought …
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.