Suprising your publication is taking the side of journalistic free speech, since you're shamefully silent when it comes to Julian Assange.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just try to suggest blowing up random US bridge for whatever reason you may prefer, all within your rights of free speech. Let's see what happens next. Do not mix freedom of speech and being free of consequences of your words.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bad. Very bad. There is nothing to do with free speech.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Reply: "stated that bombing the bridge could and should be carried out in such a way that no humans are harmed." Article: "while mitigating the risk of casualties" Might wanna rephrase that one, article clearly implies that there is a risk of human death.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So when you openly incite terrorism, you expect no response ? You have no shame, and you’re certainly not a real journal, but someone’s puppet to promote an anti-Russia agenda.pic.twitter.com/Mt19DEGIWB
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.