Damn. @benfiquista89 was sure Trump’s master plan was to enrich himself by recommending a diplomat stay at a Trump hotel some Thursday night in April 2016. I can’t believe this charge got no traction.
-
-
-
Did you even read the article? It was tossed because of lack of standing. Didn’t even get to merits of case
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seems pretty likely, given the fact that he not only didn't give up his businesses, but also that his financial dealings are currently being investigated by Mueller.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, I understand we're not speaking German, so I capitalize only proper nouns. On Mueller, I'd guess that he hasn't pursued it yet *because he's not yet finished with his investigation* and may not want to tip his hand in relation to some bigger fish (conspiracy, obstruction).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's still an unsettled point of law, whether a sitting POTUS can be served a criminal indictment, for which reason it's more likely to be argued in Congress before the courts, and as you say, that isn't likely unless the GOP lose both chambers in 2018. That said...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
reporting is that Mueller's investigation has expanded into the Trump family's finances as he looks for possible tit-for-tat arrangements related to the conspiracy DT Jr and other senior Trump campaign staff undertook w/Russian gov't (and their conduits, like Wikileaks), which...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
would likely uncover any violations of the Emoluments Clause.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's a very effective rendition of Team Trump's spin on the matter, but that's not the reality (talking points rarely are, I suppose). While it's true the requirement for disassociation with owned business is not legally codified, it has been the practice to help POTUS's...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
avoid ethical and legal concerns, not to mention possible exertion of undue influence by POTUS or foreign gov'ts. Therefore your interpretation of the possible consequences is entirely wrong. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, you don't know whether or not Trump has given...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
