Look she woke up and said something. Back to nap time
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
She sounds like a sexist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yup, as long as they're Constitutional conservatives
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Proof that the left's interest in advancing "equality" is a farce. It's about advancing inequality in the name of "social justice".
#SCOTUSThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because equality
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This isn't a new quote for her - https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/bb/will-enough-women-supreme-court-justice-ginsburg-answers-question …. If you're frequently asked "when will enough women be enough" why can't the answer
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
be 9? There's been many courts with all 9 justices as men. Her point is that if there are well qualified women, why couldn't there be 9?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, it's something she's constantly had to answer. I think it's become the "what designer are you wearing" question of being a womens rights
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.