-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
GW is quack science. Temperature sample size is too small to be valid. Earth is 4.5B years old!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How is it science to use temperature data since the 1850s to study a planet 4.5B years old?? Answer: It's not!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To be scientific, you would need to!!! Three years is just too minuscule in the big picture of earth history.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They are getting paid to conduct studies. They aren't going to question the goose they lays their golden egg. But it's still rubbish!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course you aren't going to get into that. You can't fight the truth that it is rubbish!! What temperature is earth supposed to be??
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It may be a coincidence. We've had at least 6 Ice Ages and warming periods before man. What caused those?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am very much for a clean planet. Let's spend the money developing cleaner forms of energy and planting trees. It will do more good.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
You need to learn statistics. Again, temperature trends of 5-10 years are minuscule when compared 4.5 billion years!! You know this is true!
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.