Rand Paul would have taken this opportunity to object regardless of the policy’s details. Its more about his desire to be noticed than his interest in fiscal policy.
-
-
-
WRONG! He is one of the few in the Senate that has common sense! Too much pork in the bill, including the Hyde amendment! Get the pork out and help those that need the help!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The symbolism of this is inescapable,
@randpaul. A virus loves libertarian philosophy; less restrictions = more infections. We need to protect the herd by telling individuals how they must behave responsibly. And we must care for the herd with government resources. Get well! -
TP would still be on shelves because nobody would panic buy $100 rolls.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
He would rather go to a gym and risk infecting others with the virus while awaiting his own test results; that definitely helps the situation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Every Senator should be more like Rand Paul!
-
I agree that more Republicans should come down with COVID-19, yes
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Just a reminder that your health care is being paid for by taxpayers. Some of them don’t have their own health insurance.
-
@ChrisMurphyCT isn't interested in paying for bloated benefits. His tweet says that they can't even get Republicans to decide on not setting up a slush fund for corporations. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Like the last guy left who gives a dam about overspending...and pork deals where Joe Blow gets 1K, while Mr. Stock Buyback gets 3 billion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.