That's a headline from this hearing???
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Should have been asked, what if the WB is not really a legal WB because he had no firsthand information and lied under perjury on the official complaint?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course he would. IGs need the work
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Alas, Eric Ciaramella is no whistleblower.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This whistleblower is not a whistleblower. The whistleblower under the whistleblower act only guarantees that action will be taken against reprisals. No more no less. Horowitz is lying. Horowitz is a product of the New York Southern District.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Really, and how does this apply if the whistle blower is a fake or lies? It renders WB status void.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
Yes, whistleblowers against the Clinton Foundation are very important and must be kept safe
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now if only he was an actual whistleblower and not a rabid partisan operative hiding behind an inapplicable statute.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.