Ummm, once again isn't there supposed to be a house vote before it becomes a formal impeachment? Or are we still making things up as they go along?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All this to take over purse strings of America. Most that extra money would siphon into politicians pockets, is my guess, slush funds, bogus organizations and of course offshore investments or relief funds (untraceable after paper trail destroyed).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. Prez Trump doesn't need to participate in charade. There are other witnesses that the gop should call 1st. While dems are shampeaching, prez Trump is working for America
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-


screw them allThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
US Govt has Separation of Powers - 3 branches. How does the Legislative Branch (Congressional House) dictate a deadline on what it wants the Executive Branch (the President) to do? Trump should not reply. Let Nadler take his deadline threat to the Judicial branch (Court).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why would he bother? A bunch of “ legal experts”? A conclusion already reached? Read Prof Turley column in WSJ today The whole thing is a partisan farce
#ImpeachmentThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For what?Put Schiffs!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
