I heard Sondland specifically state there was no quid pro quo and there was no investigation. Am I missing something?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The whistle blower needs to testify he is the only one who should not unelected officials with what they think should be foreign policy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Come on,
@dcexaminer! This is click bait.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm reminded of this Ivanka quote: https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/8498757-perception-is-more-important-than-reality-if-someone-perceives-something … If people perceive that there is an investigation against a political foe, it's just as damning if there IS an investigation. So Trump, Giuliani never had to get an investigation ...just lead people to believe there is 1.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Except... He doesn't tie any of the quid pro quo to the financial aid. Never heard the President order it and actually heard him deny any quid pro quo regarding aid.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unreal. Carry on destroying any shred of credibility. Implicitly assumes a need for exoneration. Pesky presumption of innocence
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is utter BS
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think you wanted to say, those the Democrats refuse to let testify. Currently the witnesses are not doing their case any good and it is starting to look very bad for the Democrats.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.