Wrong, ambassadors serve to the pleasure of @POTUS
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I mean whatever cuz all ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the duly elected chief executive officer of this country sooooo... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He probably does have a reason, but it doesn't matter. He could look at his horoscope one day and decide to call her back. His choice. No justification needed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In her opinion and that of the DC Examiner. But Ambassadors serve "at the pleasure of the President", meaning they can be dismissed at any time. Her treatment was better than what Ambassador Stevens received.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Our mission at http://OVERLOOKED.COM is to build the social news network that ends fake news. Follow us
@Overlooked_Inc - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
BS, they serve at his pleasure plus if they don’t agree with his policies then they should be replaced
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Marie & friends claim there was no reason to recall her & you accept it as indisputable proof? Your are super-fantastic at this journalism stuff! You do know that she serves at the pleasure of the President and he can actually fire her for no reason at all?She’s still employed
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
POTUS can recall an ambassador for any reason or no reason at all.
#DoYourJobThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One thing is clear. The supporters of this headline do not have a clue about who ultimately sets foreign policy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.