Depends on what is meant by "should". He had a completely untrammeled right to do so and cannot be impeached for exercising his Article 2 rights as Chief Executive. What you're saying is that there are small people who will retaliate. She's one of them.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the President. They always have. That's the only reason he needed.
-
Exactly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The President makes policy and can fire and hire whomever he feels will advance his policies. It's that simple. Bureaucrats think they run foreign policy; THEY DO NOT! Get over it!
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
The POTUS can recall and dismiss any ambassador at any time for any reason, especially if they are pushing their own policy instead of his or bad nothing him.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the president, period.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Too bad she serves at the pleasure of the person in charge
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He did not need a reason...
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.