Plus, it’s blatantly unconstitutional. It’s a taking, not a taxing.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
BECAUSE WE KNIW BEST HOW YO USE IT!!!!!!! unreal
-
I'm glad I'm not the only one who caught that.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yep, it won't work because Congress will pass a law excluding themselves from the higher tax. After all, they already did that once before with Obamacare.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Taxing the rich or large companies won’t work. Cutting government spending will
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lol they do that now. When amazon buys boxes 10%. When amazon data 10%. It’s far better than the 0% they paid last year.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Most rich people are job creators. That’s how they got rich by building businesses. I never once got a job from somebody that was drawing welfare
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Put it in our hands because we know best how to use it." This is precisely the reason I don't like Yang as a politician.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That isn't what he said.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So instead, we'll just tax the middleclass like always...
-
VAT + UBI combo means that only people who spend more than 10k/mo. on non-staple goods would be paying more than they receive. This group is the top 6% of earners- not the middle class.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.