The founders did not want a monarchy. Unchecked executive power (coupled with refusal to divest) creates the quandary wherein the sitting president makes decisions based on self preservation. Not national preservation. Defending abuse of course power (a king) is indefensible.
-
-
-
Ditto
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Unconstitutional, going to Thee Higher Court.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The OLC memo has FINALLY been been exposed. If a sitting president cannot be investigated, indicted, the rule of law is gone. The only reason our sitting president hasn’t been INDICTED? Barr chose to shield a felon based on a 1973 memo. No legal precedent. A memo.
-
It is gross. We have the systems in place to handle a rogue President. We do not have one in place to handle a complicit congress/DOJ.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Harrasment. Plain & simple.
-
Yeah he has nothing to hide but hide everything !
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hopefully Trump appeals this decision.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cher WE, Trump est totalement dans ses droits constitutionnels.. 1e, on attaque en justice pas un Président US en fonction, 2e Intimité fiscale est un droit fondamental à tout citoyen US.. Il a fait appel devant la justice US et ira jusqu'à la court Suprême !
-
aucun Juge aux USA n'a le pouvoir d'effacer les prescrits constitutionnels.. l'intimité fiscale est un droit fondamental à tout citoyen US.. en outre, c juge n'a pas le pouvoir de juger le Président US en fonction.. en aucun cas !
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.