Using the words, "was once" and "now" infers to the readers that he may have changed his stance of being a confidante, but nothing in your article shows that. Washington Examiner once wrote decent articles, but now....
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
lol then it should stat with him...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
But if anyone disagrees with him he’ll mess with their bridges.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Didnt he become popular because of his brashness?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Chicken soup. Might not help, but it sure can't hurt
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bridgegate killed his career.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh good, he's going to deal with Omar, Tlaib & Co.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who’s going to address the Fake News? ... What the American people heard last week in a NYT audio should send chills down the spines of the few remaining “journalists”. Does the Washington Examiner have the courage to save the free press? Or is Fake the new standard of the day?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.