I guess at this point lets just get the redacted report out there, so the public can judge for itself how crippling the redaction's are to a fair understanding of its conclusions. If omissions clearly suggest political & not legal intent to redact, then let the battle begin.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
"a clear preference for Trump." hardly incriminating? Taking into account: "different confidence levels" and "reasonable, transparent and open analytical disagreement"... But Leaks are sometimes unjustified and indefensible... "the dossier did not in any way inform the analysis"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Anonymous sources say what?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, considering their pedigree, what else would they say. However, the report doesn’t name names and Robert Mueller is co-editing the report for Congress. So is Mueller crooked too? I thought the Democrats referred to him as the “gold standard”.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yep. For those misguided out there who claimed Mueller was really a White Hat in disguise. Ha!
@dbonginoThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or could they be, disgruntled partisans(those angry democrats) angry that the Mueller report concluded...no collusion?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.