“Traitor” has a very narrow legal definition. The question is whether he is upholding his oath of office to put the country’s interests and the rule of law ahead of his personal and partisan interests. Whether he is faithfully executing via the DOJ. So we need to see the report.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Russia, if you're listening..."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That conclusion is premature.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Morally suspect? No, he is morally bankrupt! And traitor? Perhaps not in a legal sense but but in terms of our ideals he absolutely is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why do you call his sycophant groveling towards Putin and Russia behind closed doors and in broad daylight. I need an explanation for them changing the REP platform and on and on, including this
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/19/us/politics/trump-russia-comey.amp.html … -
*WHAT* do you call....
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There is no verdict, and literally the only people who have seen the report are those who managed to summarize it without quoting a single complete sentence. The single fact we actually know is that he wasn't exonerated of obstruction of justice.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.