Not really. His definition of what does & does not warrant CRISIS is in conflict with all Experts on the Border.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Justin Amash is not a Constitutional lawyer and knows squat about it. Maybe he could start by reading it ....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Amash's Ayn Randian position on the Constitution is that any property owner on the border has dominion over border policy and trumps Federal government's national security interests.
-
This has nothing to do with Ayn. Also, even a cursory look at the constitution and the federalist papers would let u know that the framers would sided with the property owners. Amash has principles and sticks to them even when the hurt.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.