These are not serious people
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How about doing some real work. Get your speaker back in town and start negotiating on shutdown. Don't like his proposal...fine. Where's yours?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Um, so the only reason we’ve never had a female president is because *checks article* there was no bill “authorising” it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Could you have a worse idea !? it should always be about qualifications ! Never should it be who you sleep with or if you have a vagina !
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is the case now BTW !
-
With hard work and good intentions you can be anything in the United States .
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Reasonable change reflecting present reality. No doubt there are plenty of other wording changes across statutes of a similar kind. However, I doubt that the letter of this statute would be used to disadvantage someone on the basis of their sex or sexual orientation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Liberalism is a mental disorder
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They just can’t be Hillary Clinton.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lol, the constitution says person, not man or woman.
-
Kind of like when they wanted to ban ban domestic abusers from owning guns on top of the existing ban.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.