60 CIA Officials who also need to have their security revoked. If you are not on the government payroll you should not have a security clearance. This should be addressed by Congress and enacted into law.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Take all 60 in the next swoop. If they are 'former' officials and do not directly advise the President, they are not needed at this time. Go sell your fish.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
First off - why are they "former"? Next why does anyone need a clearance for a position they no longer have? Even if need to talk with on sensitive nature temp clearance answers that issue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bet there's just as many cheering.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It once again doesn't matter. If you are not in a official capacity in the government then there is no reason to have it. They are blowing this way out of proportion because 1st they aren't President & second people who go on to be on Networks as pundits don't need to have
-
security clearance. I don't care how many bitch because we all no exactly why it is because they hate Trump. If it had been Obama or someone else this would not be happening. Once again it doesn't matter how many sign it they can even put those who have passed on & it still
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
When those officials become president, they get to determine such things.
-
Should be a good starting list for more security clearance revocations.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Soooo?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.