Compressed everything I learned about how life sciences work in the last year (and 100+ interviews) into 6000 words:https://guzey.com/how-life-sciences-actually-work/ …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @alexeyguzey @golobor
the post took a quote from
@cshalizi out of context to make roughly the opposite point from the one he was making http://bactra.org/weblog/practical-peer-review.html …2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @dbweissman @alexeyguzey
the recommendation that the NIH should be "trying to fund small teams" is odd – it already does. most of the funding already does allow multiple PIs. MIRAs are the exception
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dbweissman
I think my phrasing here was a bit sloppy, however judging by the absence of labs being run by co-PIs, it doesn't seem like it's making much impact? might be wrong here..
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I think the problem is not NIH funding structures. They’re less unfriendly to this kind of thing than university hiring & promotion or peer evaluation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.