Compressed everything I learned about how life sciences work in the last year (and 100+ interviews) into 6000 words:https://guzey.com/how-life-sciences-actually-work/ …
Show this thread
-
this can be interpreted as an argument against peer review! :) I had >10 people read the draft before publication because prior experience shows that 2-3 careful readers almost never catch even the majority of problems
This actually brings up my disagreement with the substance of that section. This *is* peer review. “Post-publication peer review”. What people object to is pre-pub peer review, which we’re already getting away from thanks to arXiv & bioRxiv
