@numogram @okayultra @InfiniteSynths ... If it says "We can transcend harsh Darwinian reality for something kinder" LOL.
-
-
@0xDEBA5E12 @InfiniteSynths@numogram@okayultra ... all those games being played in it belong to systems that will survive, or not. ... -
@0xDEBA5E12 @InfiniteSynths@numogram@okayultra ... 'We' can try to understand the game, experiment with it, but we can't referee it. -
@dblbd@0xDEBA5E12@numogram@okayultra Don't think XF really drifts too far from this assertion. -
@InfiniteSynths
@0xDEBA5E12@numogram@okayultra "Crude biological determinism" is clearly untenable, agreed. -
@dblbd@0xDEBA5E12@numogram@okayultra LC pushes the epistemological over the ontological though, and ends up granting more agency to -
@dblbd@0xDEBA5E12@numogram@okayultra conceptualisation, which shifts the playing field a little ... -
@dblbd@0xDEBA5E12@numogram@okayultra away from nature and towards the rationalist tradition. - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@dblbd @InfiniteSynths@numogram@okayultra ah, *you're* dblbd. sorry for deleting you're @. thought it was a typo on my behalf. -
@dblbd @InfiniteSynths@numogram@okayultra you're right. a *transcendent* instrumental subject is as much a fantasy as deified nature
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.