@dblbd twin (to me) to Heidegger's habit of magisterially moving-on after 2 sentences: Deleuze all but quoting him and not acknowledging it.
-
-
@dblbd definitely covers it most of the time...a mode of instrumental convergence really, in their case(s). but "destines it in advance"? -
@dblbd there aren't many (that I know of or noticed at the time, big proviso) that emphatic, but it's definitely a thing...right?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@_100101890 ... It's not as if Heidegger is doing that much beside plastering Kant with black forest gateaux.
-
@dblbd oh, come on. he simplified Kant's baroque symmetry groups into a recursion structure. there's no Deleuzean univocality without that -
@dblbd "Clearly, the method must proceed by harmonious composition of 3s and 4s as follows from my premises" -
@_100101890 Yes, Schopenhauer derided that too (on the way to excavating The Fourfold Root of Sufficient Reason, by 'coincidence').
-
@dblbd not the use of the symmetry groups, just (AFAIK) not noticing it. tho given our initial context, 0-hypothesis is he just said nothing -
@dblbd *that I'm deriding. (Not like I can mount a defense of Lederhosen.) -
@_100101890 Appreciating your restraint in not going full: "If you're so goddamn derisive how come you're eating cold catfood from the tin?"
-
@dblbd you or Schopenhauer? ;-) - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.