@dblbd Thereby reviving epistemology as a possibility ~ L#A is epistemological acceleration above all else.
-
-
Replying to @qdnoktsqfr
@InfiniteSynths LA (cutely) thinks it can do that without prosthetics. This (communist) is more RA in that respect:http://onlineopen.org/capital-thinks-too …
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @dblbd
@InfiniteSynths (Italians have communism hard coded into their DNA, so it's easier to discount, and concentrate upon what they're saying.)
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @dblbd
@dblbd THX missed that one. Question of causal emphasis of symbolic forms awesomely visualised here, I reckon.pic.twitter.com/xMSsX679xf
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @qdnoktsqfr
@dblbd 'Can the ontology of capital be diverted into an epistemological project capable of disarming its ontological source?'1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @qdnoktsqfr
@dblbd Not quite sure what you mean about L#A denying prosthetics tho. They explicity invoke them, no?2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @qdnoktsqfr
@InfiniteSynths Probably that was unduly harsh overkill (which would be a first from me).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
@InfiniteSynths Brandom tendency was what led me to the (over-stated) "Christ, they really think they can do this with human brains!" spasm.
-
-
Replying to @qdnoktsqfr
@dblbd (Still boring though. Hence the laboriousness of the inhuman.)0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.