@dblbd But extra twisty ones.
-
-
@dblbd THX missed that one. Question of causal emphasis of symbolic forms awesomely visualised here, I reckon.pic.twitter.com/xMSsX679xf
-
@dblbd K so, question (for L#A) is ... -
@dblbd 'Can the ontology of capital be diverted into an epistemological project capable of disarming its ontological source?' -
@dblbd Not quite sure what you mean about L#A denying prosthetics tho. They explicity invoke them, no? -
@InfiniteSynths Probably that was unduly harsh overkill (which would be a first from me).
-
@dblbd It's ok, I know you're a giant no party grump these days. -
@dblbd But at least you're not into Brandom. -
@InfiniteSynths Brandom tendency was what led me to the (over-stated) "Christ, they really think they can do this with human brains!" spasm.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@dblbd (Did we just slide into an HBD analysis of LA v RA?) (On that and relevant to Matteo's piece ... -
@dblbd ... Fair to understand HBD as a continuation of Nietzsche's (unwritten) physiology of aesthetics, morality, economics, theology ... -
@dblbd ... politcs / a genealogical differential ontology for C21st / demise of the cults of Hummpa-Taddum / ultimate repudiation of pomo?)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.