@dblbd Does (((-P))):=0?
H/T @InfiniteSynths @mmhare @topherleigh
-
-
Replying to @lutlopl
@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@mmhare@topherleigh Some drift this end from Barker-notational fundamentalism -- seems repulsively messy. ...1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dblbd
@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@mmhare@topherleigh ... Post-nullotation conventions -- in which '( )' = '0' -- make Barker's '-P' look indulgent.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @dblbd
@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@mmhare@topherleigh ... Agreed, of course, that the problem of zero-denotation is then left open. ...1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dblbd
@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@mmhare@topherleigh ... Right now it looks like a sacrifice worth making to render unity (explicitly) unthinkable.2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @dblbd
@dblbd@lutlopl@mmhare@topherleigh@technoshamanist So (forgetting the (-P) function), TX notates nothing but pure differentiation?2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
@InfiniteSynths @lutlopl @mmhare @topherleigh @technoshamanist For "forgetting" -- just from here -- it's more "stowing it on the shelf" ...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.