@dblbd Does (((-P))):=0?
H/T @InfiniteSynths @mmhare @topherleigh
-
-
@mmhare@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@topherleigh ... transfinite set of the Naturals, with the sole exceptions of zero, and one. ... -
@mmhare@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@topherleigh ... Is it really tolerable to introduce new signs to mop up that spillage? (Dunno.) -
@dblbd@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@topherleigh But interesting problem considering the value of TX is in large part its parsimony -
@mmhare@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@topherleigh Total stab-in-the-dark hunch -- just one more carefully-selected sign ... -
@mmhare@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@topherleigh ... enabling Gödel-coding, perhaps, and Xenotation acquires undelimitable semiotic powers. ... -
@mmhare@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@topherleigh ... especially when it's noted that there are some untapped syntactical resources left, ... -
@mmhare@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@topherleigh ... for e.g., lexicographic 'mis-sequencing' of clusters, which could carry information. ... -
@mmhare@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@topherleigh "What can agglomerated implexions of nothingness (and nothing else) do?"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.